Aligning PHM, SHM and CBM by understanding the physical system failure behaviour

Tiedo Tinga and Richard Loendersloot
Submission Type: 
Full Paper
AttachmentSizeTimestamp
phmce_14_033.pdf1.5 MBJune 12, 2014 - 11:39am

In this work the three disciplines of condition based maintenance (CBM), structural health monitoring (SHM) and prognostics and health management (PHM) are described. Then the characteristics of the disciplines are compared, which leads to a clear insight in the commonalities, but also in the difference in objectives and scope of the three disciplines. The disciplines are then demonstrated using three different case studies on bearing vibration monitoring, composite panel structural health monitoring and helicopter landing gear prognostics, respectively. After a discussion on the benefits of understanding the system physical (failure) behaviour, an integrated approach is proposed in which the three disciplines are aligned. This approach starts from defining an appropriate monitoring strategy (SHM and CM) and eventually ends in supporting the decision making (PHM) that leads to an optimal maintenance process throughout the life cycle of the asset.

Publication Year: 
2014
Publication Volume: 
5
Publication Control Number: 
033
Page Count: 
10
Submission Keywords: 
predictive maintenance
physics of failure
monitoring
Submission Topic Areas: 
Component-level PHM
Model-based methods for fault detection, diagnostics, and prognosis
Physics of failure
Structural health monitoring
Systems and platform applications
Submitted by: 
  
 
 
 

follow us

PHM Society on Facebook Follow PHM Society on Twitter PHM Society on LinkedIn PHM Society RSS News Feed