Identification of Industrial Robot Arm Work Cell Use Cases and a Test Bed to Promote Monitoring, Diagnostic, and Prognostic Technologies

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Published Oct 2, 2017
Brian A. Weiss Alexander Klinger

Abstract

The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is performing research to advance the state of the art in monitoring, diagnostic, and prognostic technologies (collectively known as prognostics and health management (PHM)) to enhance decision-making at the factory floor to promote smarter maintenance and control strategies. One specific thrust in this hierarchical research is focused at the work cell level. A robot system is the focus of this research level where the manufacturing community would benefit from measurement science (e.g., performance metrics, test methods, reference datasets, software tools) to design, deploy, verify, and validate PHMC technologies aimed at a robot system work cell. NIST’s identification of representative manufacturing robot work cell use cases will provide the foundation for which it will construct its own physical test bed. The test bed is designed to emulate the chosen robot system use case and afford sufficient flexibility to add, subtract, or upgrade components and capabilities to be commensurate with common industrial practices. This paper presents various use case options that NIST has considered and highlights the one that will be the foundation of the physical test bed. Additionally, the initial test bed design is introduced.

How to Cite

Weiss, B. A., & Klinger, A. (2017). Identification of Industrial Robot Arm Work Cell Use Cases and a Test Bed to Promote Monitoring, Diagnostic, and Prognostic Technologies. Annual Conference of the PHM Society, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.36001/phmconf.2017.v9i1.2189
Abstract 362 | PDF Downloads 269

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.details##

Keywords

prognostics, diagnostic, measurement science, use cases, test bed

References
Abdi, H., Nahavandi, S., Frayman, Y., & Maciejewski, A. A. (2012). Optimal mapping of joint faults into healthy joint velocity space for fault-tolerant redundant manipulators. Robotica, 30, 635-648. doi:10.1017/s0263574711000671
DeVlieg, R. (2010). Expanding the use of robotics in airframe assembly via accurate robot technology. SAE Int. J. Aerospace, 3(1), 198-203.
Hedberg, T., & Helu, M. (2016). Smart Manufacturing Systems (SMS) Test Bed. Retrieved from http://www.nist.gov/el/facilities_instruments/smstestbed.cfm
Helu, M., & Hedberg, T. (2015). Enabling smart manufacturing research and development using a product lifecycle test bed. Procedia Manufacturing, 1, 86-97.
Helu, M., & Weiss, B. A. (2016). The current state of sensing, health management, and control for small-to-medium-szed manufacturers. Paper presented at the ASME 2016 Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, MSEC2016.
Jin, X., Siegel, D., Weiss, B. A., Gamel, E., Wang, W., Lee, J., & Ni, J. (2016). The present status and future growth of maintenance in US manufacturing: results from a pilot survey. Manufacturing Rev., 3, 10.
Jin, X., Weiss, B. A., Siegel, D., & Lee, J. (2016). Present Status and Future Growth of Advanced Maintenance Technology and Strategy in US Manufacturing. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 7 (Special Issue on Smart Manufacturing PHM)(Sp5), 18.
Kahan, T., Bukchin, Y., Menassa, R., & Ben-Gal, I. (2009). Backup strategy for robots’ failures in an automotive assembly system. International Journal of Production Economics, 120(2), 315-326. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.09.015
Kusuda, Y. (1999). Robotization in the Japanese automotive industry. Industrial Robot, 26(5), 358-360. doi:10.1108/01439919910283786
Lee, J., Ghaffari, M., & Elmeligy, S. (2011). Self-maintenance and engineering immune systems: Towards smarter machines and manufacturing systems. Annual Reviews in Control, 35(1), 111-122. doi:10.1016/j.arcontrol.2011.03.007
Malinowski, M., Beling, P., Haimes, Y., LaViers, A., Marvel, J., & Weiss, B. (2015). System Interdependency Modeling in the Design of Prognostic and Health Management Systems in Smart Manufacturing. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society 2015, Coronado, CA. http://www.nist.gov/manuscript-publication-search.cfm?pub_id=918960
National Institute of Standards and Technology. (2017). Prognostics, Health Management, and Control (PHMC). Retrieved from http://www.nist.gov/el/isd/ks/phmc.cfm
Pellegrino, J., Justiniano, M., Raghunathan, A., & Weiss, B. A. (2016). Measurement Science Roadmap for Prognostics and Health Management for Smart Manufacturing Systems. NIST Advanced Manufacturing Seriess (AMS).
Peng, Y., Dong, M., & Zuo, M. J. (2010). Current status of machine prognostics in condition-based maintenance: a review. The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 50(1-4), 297-313.
Qiao, G., & Weiss, B. A. (2016). Advancing Measurement Science to Assess Monitoring, Diagnostics, and Prognostics for Manufacturing Robotics. International Journal of Prognostics and Health Management, 7, 13.
Qiao, G., & Weiss, B. A. (2017). Accuracy Degradation Analysis for Industrial Robot Systems. Paper presented at the ASME International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference, Los Angeles, California.
Visinsky, M. L., Cavallaro, J. R., & Walker, I. D. (1994). ROBOTIC FAULT-DETECTION AND FAULT-TOLERANCE - A SURVEY. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 46(2), 139-158. doi:10.1016/0951-8320(94)90132-5
Vogl, G. W., Donmez, M. A., Archenti, A., & Weiss, B. A. (2016). Inertial Measurement Unit for On-Machine Diagnostics of Machine Tool Linear Axes. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society 2016, Denver, CO.
Vogl, G. W., Pavel, R., Archenti, A., Winnard, T. J., Mennu, M. M., Weiss, B. A., & Donmez, M. A. (2017). Identification of machine tool geometric performance using on-machine inertial measurements. Paper presented at the 6th International Conference on Virtual Machining Process Technology (VMPT 2017), Montreal, Canada.
Vogl, G. W., Weiss, B. A., & Donmez, M. A. (2014). Standards Related to Prognostics and Health Management (PHM) for Manufacturing (NISTIR 8012). Retrieved from Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA: http://dx.doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8012
Vogl, G. W., Weiss, B. A., & Helu, M. (2016). A review of diagnostic and prognostic capabilities and best practices for manufacturing. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing. doi:10.1007/s10845-016-1228-8
Wang, R., Liu, L., & Xu, F. (2008). Research on prognostics technology of robot system. Machine Tool and Hydraulics, 30(11), 15-19.
Weiss, B. A., Helu, M., Vogl, G. W., & Qiao, G. (2016). Use Case Development to Advanced Monitoring, Diagnostics, and Prognostics in Manufacturing Operations. Paper presented at the IMS2016 - Intelligent Manufacturing Systems, Austin, Texas.
Weiss, B. A., & Qiao, G. (2017). Hierarchical Decomposition of a Manufacturing Work Cell to Promote Monitoring, Diagnostics, and Prognostics. Paper presented at the ASME 2017 International Manufacturing Science and Engineering Conference (MSEC2017), Los Angeles, California.
Weiss, B. A., Vogl, G. W., Helu, M., Qiao, G., Pellegrino, J., Justiniano, M., & Raghunathan, A. (2015). Measurement Science for Prognostics and Health Management for Smart Manufacturing Systems: Key Findings from a Roadmapping Workshop. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Prognostics and Health Management Society 2015, Coronado, CA.
Zwicker, C., & Reinhart, G. (2014). Human-robot-collaboration system for a universal packaging cell for heavy electronic consumer goods Enabling Manufacturing Competitiveness and Economic Sustainability (pp. 195-199): Springer.
Section
Technical Research Papers