- This topic has 2 replies, 3 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 10 months ago by
.
-
Posts
-
Just wondering, how come the teams with lower points are actually ahead of those with high scores in the ranking? As of June 6, leading team has 58 however the third place has 99.
Just wondering, how come the teams with lower points are actually ahead of those with high scores in the ranking? As of June 6, leading team has 58 however the third place has 99.“Please note that to diminish the chance of using gradient information, the scores are obscured a bit. However, the rank order is correct – i.e., 1st listed team has best score, 2nd team has 2nd best score, etc.”
We rank teams based on how they are actually doing, but we report scores based on a subset. I have tweaked the way the subset is chosen to diminish the disparity a bit.
If you can give out this information — does the subset change on subsequent scorings?
E.g. if our score goes up from one day to the next, can we be confident that the new submission performed better, or could small variations possibly be attributed to changes of the subset used to calculate the displayed score?
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.